Hopefull Handbags Global Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824626673
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
St Augustine, FL, USA
Phone
9048387158
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Gift Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,906
Expenses
$205,037
Assets
$66,873
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DEBBIE MIELE (DIRECTOR)
  • LEONA BURTON (DIRECTOR)
  • EVELYN MARRON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hopefull handbags global, inc. Supports survivors of domestic abuse and their children as they rebuild life after crisis. Program services include long-term stabilization, mentoring, self-perception education, safety guidance, budgeting, employment readiness, and children's support through the shine, new, and rise programs. Donations are used to help families regain normalcy, make ends meet while they get back on their feet, and access practical needs such as food, hygiene products, school supplies, transportation assistance, utility support, rent assistance when needed and appropriate, household essentials, job-readiness resources, and mentoring. The organization's goal is to help survivors and their children move toward safety, health, wellness, long-term sustainability, a healthy self-perception, confidence, and independence.

What it reported doing in 2025

Handbag distributions to victims and survivors: in-kind donations made - $75,319 to various shelters and organizations. Handbags were received, cleaned, marked and filled with necessities and notes of positive encouragement. Bags fair market value ranged from $75-150 for small up to large bags filled.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -58.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.