Hope4ukraine

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881488032
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Kings Mills, OH, USA
Phone
4432210861
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,260
Expenses
$9,820
Assets
$1,761
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Regina Appatova (Interim President)

People named in this filing

  • Regina Appatova (Interim President)
  • Natalya Artemova (Treasurer)
  • Alina Zilbergerts (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our goal is to provide disaster relief aid to the desperately suffering people in Ukraine in the form of essential items such as food, water, clothes and shoes, hygiene products, medical supplies, medical equipment, and through monetary help. Also our activities cover an educational purpose introducing people in the USA to Ukrainian culture. Through art and music Hope4Ukraine spreads the knowledge about Ukrainian traditions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Program 1. Medical Supplies and Equipment. In 2025, Hope4Ukraine provided humanitarian and medical assistance to Ukrainian hospitals, charitable foundations, and volunteer organizations responding to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Program funding supported the purchase of emergency medical supplies, tactical medicine, hemostatic tourniquets, and specialized equipment for hospitals treating wounded and burn trauma patients. The program focused on rapid-response aid for civilians, internally displaced persons, and military personnel affected by the conflict, while partnering with trusted local organizations delivering direct support on the ground in Ukraine

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -120% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -92.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -40.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.