Hope2Live Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461075413
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Alpharetta, GA, USA
Phone
6785488034
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,498
Expenses
$144,292
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Steve Meeker (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jason Phillips (Director)
  • Steve Meeker (President)
  • Layla Marshall (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ to people in poverty and crisis by meeting their spiritual and physical needs.

What it reported doing in 2014

Sanders Marshall Memorial Christian Clinic (SMMCC): H2L started the construction of the Sanders Marshall Memorial Christian Clinic (SMMCC) in early 2012 in the village of Hastings, which is east of the capital of Freetown in Sierra Leone. The clinic will serve over 15,000 people in the village of Hastings and the surrounding areas, and people from as far as 20 miles away are accessing its services. Construction was completed in September 2013, and the clinic opened its doors for primary care, urgent care, lab, and pharmacy services on September 25, 2013. The clinic has been seeing up to 20 patients per day for issues such as malaria, typhoid, dehydration, malnutrition, and other general primary care issues, and this daily volume is expected to double with the opening of the maternity section full-time. The government of Sierra Leone requested that we expand the lab services in September 2013 in order to become a regional HIV/AIDS testing and counseling center for clinics in the region. In addition, they asked our ministry partner to provide overnight sleeping quarters for clinicians tending to women in labor and patients requiring overnight care. Funds were raised in December 2013 for the expansion, and the construction was completed in March 2014. The maternity/labor & delivery services started in early March 2014, and 24 hour services started at the end of March 2014. Funds were also contributed for the digging of a fresh water well on the clinic property, and the digging commenced by hand in late 2013 with completion expected in April 2014. The well will provide clean water to the clinic, as well as the surrounding villages.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 32%; rating input score 32

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -344%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -146.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 32% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.