Hope That Binds Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464105551
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Paducah, KY, USA
- Phone
- 2705599649
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adoption
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $342,060
- Expenses
- $346,066
- Assets
- $150,286
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WENDY WILSON (PRESIDENT)
- BROOKE KELLY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- OLIVIA LOOPER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- OLIVIA LOOPER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $26,443 total reported compensation
- JONI CARRICO (ORGANIZATIONAL): $10,000 total reported compensation
- ASHLEY HARVEY (MERCHANDISE COORDINATOR): $800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing adoption and foster care services
What it reported doing in 2024
Hope that binds serves the western Kentucky and surrounding areas as a ministry by providing adoption and foster care resources
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Affiliate network. The nonprofit sent 74% of its reported program spending through affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has grown recently. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 54
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.3%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 62.5%; rating input score 62; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 34.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.3% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $283K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $26K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 21 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.