Hope Pregnancy Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742129002
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Killeen, TX, USA
Phone
2545014181
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,424,117
Expenses
$1,247,614
Assets
$1,384,340
Liabilities
$301,916

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARILYN HOETH (PRESIDENT)
  • JOAN MANNING (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARILYN HOETH (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVE MCMURRY (TREASURER)
  • CHARLES JENKINS (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide emotional and practical assistance in a crisis pregnancy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hope pregnancy center is a non-profit, christ-centered ministry, offering practical support to girls, women, and families. Hope pc empowers men, women, and youth to make life-affirming, informed choices regarding sexual integrity, pregnancy, and the sanctity of human life. The 3 centers located in temple, tx, killeen, tx and copperas cove, tx, offer free and confidential pregnancy tests, limited ultrasounds, options counseling, emotional support, post-abortion grief ministry, parenting classes, maternity clothing, baby clothing and accessories, referrals to life-affirming community help organizations and churches. 18 staff and about 120 volunteers are offered training opportunities including human trafficking awareness training on a monthly basis with the goal of offering compassionate care with integrity to all clients. In 2024, the following services were provided: 5981 total services, 1824 pregnancy tests, 1954 community referral, 3374 clients received clothing and baby accessories, 1232 limited ultrasounds provided, 404 received parenting education, 224 clients chose to follow jesus christ, 1402 were presented the gospel of jesus christ, 123 clients who initially stated intentions to abort pregnancy or were undecided later stated they intended to carry the baby, 244 clients who were at risk of choosing abortion stated they intended to carry the baby to term, 0 chose adoption for their babies, and 412 received post abortion grief support. 465 known military clients. All ultrasounds are performed by medical personnel such as rns who have been trained by certified rdms instructors. All medical information and services are reviewed and approved by a licensed ob-gyn who serves as the medical director.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.5%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.5% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $874K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.