Hope Pathways Global Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
332091275
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Tempe, AZ, USA
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,576
Expenses
$2,889
Assets
$2,887

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mariatu Esther Kabba (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Mary Jane Andrews (Board Chair)
  • Julia Wallace (Treasurer)
  • Adekalie Bangura (Vice Board Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hope Pathways Global Inc. advances education leadership development and digital skills for women and underserved communities in Arizona and Sierra Leone. During the tax year the organization implemented early-stage programs in partnership with Arizona State Universitys Thunderbird School of Global Management through the 100 Million Learners initiative 120+ learners reached and delivered community-based empowerment activities including the Girls Power Summit Global Sisters engagement and a Global Roundtable reaching over 220 individuals. Additional efforts focused on program development partnerships and expanding access to non-traditional education pathways.

What it reported doing in 2025

Digital Education & Leadership Training: Hope Pathways Global Inc. provides digital education leadership development and mentorship opportunities for women and girls in Arizona and Sierra Leone. In 2025 the organization trained 120 learners through the 100 Million Learners initiative and delivered skills-based training in AI entrepreneurship and leadership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.