Hope of the Poor Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474300290
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Lincoln, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4024207475
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,261,018
- Expenses
- $957,739
- Assets
- $1,291,374
- Liabilities
- $2,638
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CRAIG JOHRING (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES MAINELLI (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CRAIG JOHRING (PRESIDENT): $35,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire all generations to radically live out the gospel through finding christ in the distressing disguise of the poor.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025, hope of the poor served thousands of meals to the homeless on the streets of mexico city. In addition to food, the homeless received shoes, clothing, and blankets. In 2025, we moved 25 new families off the street. This has been an amazing year of working with the poor and homeless in mexico city. Each family lived on the street because one or both parents struggled with drug or alcohol addiction. Our first step is to get the family into safe housing, and then we check one or both parents into a rehabilitation center for 3 months of treatment. We care for the family during the three months and enroll the kids in school. Each person reads or listens to the bible each day, and we have classes each week to help them grow in their relationship with christ. After rehab, we connect the parents with a job. Each of these kids has a new life. All were taken off the street and are no longer homeless. Their parents no longer take drugs, and they are now being raised in a christian home. Each child goes to school and is catching up on the years they missed. The hope of the poor ministry in mexico city continues to grow and impact more lives. Our full-time therapist meets with the families each week to teach our life-skills classes. We have four individuals working full-time to visit homes each day and work on the street to serve the homeless. Each was homeless and came into our ministry with their families several years ago. They have overcome their addictions and now help others leave the street and end their addictions. Our operations team constantly builds new partnerships with employers and organizations to bring resources to the poor.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.1%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $946K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.