HOPE in Lancaster Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570752150
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lancaster, SC, USA
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,184,345
- Expenses
- $1,280,609
- Assets
- $943,857
- Liabilities
- $20,610
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
People named in this filing
- Verta Looper (Chair)
- Susan Jordan (Treasurer)
- Dr Crystal Maxwell (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
HOPE in Lancaster's mission is to provide support and education that will promote food security and a path to economic mobility.
What it reported doing in 2024
Short-term AssistanceProvides short-term emergency assistance to those in crisis. The primary items provided to families in need are: rent and utility assistance, as well as referrals to partner agencies.Bounce Back ProgramProvides up to 6 months assistance to qualified clients, including financial assistance, financial mentoring, job seeking assistance, and nutritious food counseling and food from the pantry.Fresh & Healthy Food InitiativeProvides food from a selection process to our short-term assistance clients. Provides a staple food option to qualified Seniors. Provides Farmer's Market Voucher to clients in all programs opening up nutritious options for them with our local farmers.Fresh & Healthy Food Initiative: Teaching Kitchen Provides cooking and nutrition education that nurtures skills in food selection and preparation. Provides innovative, theory-based, cost-effective solutions to chronic food and nutrition problems impacting individuals and families. We have introduced a fee for the community classes and the partnership classes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.9%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $41.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.1%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.9% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.