Hope for Hilltribes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270400885
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6142058205
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $113,304
- Expenses
- $134,590
- Assets
- $193,570
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Fred Haring (President)
- Bill Sjoblom (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Fred Haring (President)
- Hilary McComb (Board Member)
- Bill Sjoblom (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide educational and medical assistance to tribal minorities suffering from poverty, HIV/AIDS and disabilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
The House of Love supports children who have been or are in unsafe situations. We have assisted 30 children and 101 family members. The Family of Love educates and coaches struggling families. Forty-one people enrolled and 8 families supported. The House of Blessing supports education through a preschool and scholarship program. Sixty-three children attended preschool and 62 children received scholarships.The Christian Center for Development of People with Disabilities assists people with disabilities to live independently. 147 children and 178 adults assisted.HFH also provides life skills training and needs based funding for more than 15 former House of Love residents who have gone on to university or vocational training.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $129K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.