Hope & a Future Iii Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271019237
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Madison, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6088310243
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $726,128
- Expenses
- $457,592
- Assets
- $2,060,525
- Liabilities
- $914,175
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK BARNARD (PRESIDENT)
- PAULA REIF (VICE PRESIDENT/COORDINATOR AMERICORPS SENIORS NATI)
- KARIN KRAUSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KARIN KRAUSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $62,385 total reported compensation
- NANCY WHITNEY (SECRETARY/ADMIN ASSISTANT & BOOKKEEPER): $7,316 total reported compensation
- PAULA REIF (VICE PRESIDENT/COORDINATOR AMERICORPS SENIORS NATI): $2,285 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Creating an inclusive and vibrant neighborhood where children, families and older adults help each other flourish.
What it reported doing in 2025
Hope & a future currently operates a licensed adult family home that provides care to older adults with a wide variety of diagnoses and needs. Our adult family home is home to senior residents, staff, and sometimes the staff's children. Our pioneering model includes a live-in registered nurse and occupational therapist as well as hands on care givers who may have the option to receive room and board in exchange for helping with evening and weekend hours. This model helps to overcome the caregiver workforce crisis and gives seniors a stable staff while providing lower-income wage earners a stable home in the context of a family of friends caregiving model. All residents enjoy goal-directed living and the support of each other. The health and vigor of older adults improves after admission--even in the face of advancing disease and dementia. Residents flourish together. And when the end of life is near, we work with hospice allowing residents to remain in place, with their family of friends.in 2025 hope & a future enjoyed hundreds of volunteers and guests. Every summer we have work groups and outdoor events with music. We host monthly potlucks and house concerts. It is a joy to host events and offer community volunteer opportunities. This year 167 volunteers contributed 2147.25 hours (value at $74,703). We are very grateful! Hope & a future is moving forward with expansion plans. We are excited to see the completion of our pioneering theraputic interactive intergerational neighborhood (tiin) model. We are engaged in planning for the expansion of housing and services. We have contracts with architects, engineers, interior designers, and lawyers. We have required zoning and conditional use permits and we have applied for a building permit. We have a letter of intent to collaborate with a bilingual multicultural school to operate daycare, pre-k and after school programs. We are grateful to continue to benefit from many expert advisors, our skilled volunteer board of directors and capital campaign committee. Our timeline for building expansion is dependant on reaching our fundraising goal. We have made progress with fundraising although this effort continues. We are currently looking at potential collaborations for building and financing. Much of our support is grass roots and from family and friends of those who have used our services since 2002, their confidence in our work spurs us on!
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.1%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.5; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.1% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $385K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $62K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.