Hope 360 Pregnancy Clinic

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463319273
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Oregon City, OR, USA
Phone
5039081861
Rating
95
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Pregnancy Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,404
Expenses
$125,444
Assets
$59,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Johanna Eggimann (Executive Dir.)
  • Sherilyn Sander (Board Member)
  • Jacquie Peterson (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hope 360 Pregnancy Clinic exists to help women facing unintended pregnancies through education, prevention, emotional support, spiritual engagement, physical assistance and healing.

What it reported doing in 2018

Hope 360 Pregnancy Clinic gives women a safe place to come to when experiencing an unplanned pregnancy. We educate women about all of the options empowering them to make life affirming decisions. All of our services are free. We offer pregnancy testing, limited ultra-sound to verify a viable pregnancy and pre-natal vitamins. Verification of pregnancy so they can get onto OHP. Referrals and resources when needed. Parenting class, encouraging both parents of baby to attend and baby items if needed. We also offer a class for women who have had an abortion and are seeking healing and forgiveness in their lives. We encourage young people to choose abstinence until married. Educate about STD's.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.6%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $125K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.