Hoosick Area Partnership for Parents and Youth

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202326117
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hoosick Falls, NY, USA
Phone
5186869050
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,602
Expenses
$79,103
Assets
$776,244
Liabilities
$21,474

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David Borge (Vice President)
  • Marianne Zwicklbauer (President)

People named in this filing

  • David Borge (Vice President)
  • Shelly Stiles (Secretary)
  • Penny Acree (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Hoosick Area Partnership for Parents and Youth is to foster the well-being of our community. This is accomplished through a variety of initiatives including rural revival, arts, wellness, youth and community programs; small business incubation; community events and outreach; and community partnerships.

What it reported doing in 2024

We strive to provide programs in an environment that fosters the well-being of our community as a whole. Such programs include partnerships with local public school and community organizations. These programs include HFCS Cheerleading, HFCS Air Rifle Team, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts and the Hoosick Falls Pickleball Club. Living Resources, an organization that provides services to individuals challenged by intellectual and developmental disabilities as well as those who are brain injury survivors, maintains an office in the Armory in order to better serve those in the greater Hoosick area. Unity House, a human service agency, also maintains an office in the Armory and works closely with our local police department. They assist victims of domestic violence, those living in poverty, adults with mental illness or HIV/AIDS and children with developmental delays by providing crisis intervention, advocacy, information, skills teaching, resources, encouragement and support to those living in the greater Hoosick area. These programs engage and inspire our youth and families and provide support and enrichment to our whole community. Funding for these programs is subsidized by contributions, local grants and fundraising.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.1%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 58.1%; rating input score 58
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.81; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.1% of revenue deployed · 58.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.