Hoofbeats in the City F/k/a Friends of Lakewood Equestrian Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993743905
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
Phone
5624981612
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$72,945
Expenses
$615
Assets
$72,945
Liabilities
$615

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jennifer Meeker (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jennifer Meeker (President)
  • Russell Triplett (Treasurer)
  • Debra Mills (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charitable

What it reported doing in 2024

Prepare and submissions of response to Request for Proposals to Operate the Lakewood Equestrian Center: The City of Lakewood threatened to close down the Lakewood Equestrian Center, a nearly 80 years public equestrian facility that provides riding opportunities/instruction and horse boarding in an urban area for over 100 horses. The City sought a new operator for the facility. The nonprofit studied the facility and opportunity and prepared a comprehensive over 100 page proposal for the operation of the facility as a public horse boarding and community facility teaching and providing opportunities for the community to learn riding, horsemanship, horse case, and urban agriculture at low or no cost, with a focus on youth education about horses and urban agricuture.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 99.2%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 118.61; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.