Hood County Volunteer Fire Department Station 70
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752063612
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Granbury, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8175797357
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $134,593
- Expenses
- $150,461
- Assets
- $167,691
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- MATT JACKSON (FIRE CHIEF)
- JUSTIN HEYWOOD (ASSISTANT FI)
- ERIC OVERMAN (OPERATIONS C)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Firefighting services, station 70 members respond to calls in designated area and surrounding community. Emergency medical services, station 70 members respond to emergency medical calls as first responders only without transportation abilities in designated area and surrounding community, traffic wrecks and rescue situations. The intent of the hood county volunteer fire department station 70 is to perpetually respond to fire and rescue emergencies within designated response areas and mutual aid requests to protect lives and property. It is also our assumed responsibility to assist our citizens and neighbors in any philanthropic activities, fund raising and preserve the environment through approved contracts within our designated area and any other entity that would make a request. The time spent on these activities are on an as needed or per call basis.
What it reported doing in 2025
Fire and rescue services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 60.6%; rating input score 61
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 60.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $91K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.