Honey Brook Elementary Center Parent Teacher Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452445561
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Honey Brook, PA, USA
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,186
- Expenses
- $20,971
- Assets
- $97,231
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jamie Smith (President)
- Lauren Larrick (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jamie Smith (President)
- Lauren Larrick (Vice President)
- Tobey Green (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary purpose of this organization is to foster the relationship between Honey Brook Elementary Center and the community in order to provide students the highest advantages in physical mental and social education. The PTO does this by raising funds holding events and providing volunteers.
What it reported doing in 2024
One of the goals of the PTO is show appreciation and provide assistance to teachers aides and administration. During conferences the teachers need to stay at the school for a full school day and in the evening. The PTO provides meals for the teachers during these times. Additionally the PTO provides a breakfast and various treats for teacher appreciation week. The educators go above and beyond often working long hours and taking care of tasks behind the scenes. The PTO strives to show appreciation for these efforts to encourage the teachers and bring out the best in them. These activities serve approximately 50 people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, 20% for grants, and 1% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.5%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 62.8%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.64; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.5% of revenue deployed · 62.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.