Homeward Animal Shelter Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450284164
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Fargo, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7012390077
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,662,816
- Expenses
- $1,689,039
- Assets
- $4,433,626
- Liabilities
- $605,251
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE GJESDAHL (PRESIDENT)
- TIM FLAKOLL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TASHA HAUG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TASHA HAUG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $91,138 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To care for, protect and place animals for adoption in life long homes, and to prevent cruelty to animals by educating our community in the proper and humane care of all animals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Homeward animal shelter (has) is a local and community-funded, non-profit animal shelter. Since its inception in 1966, homeward animal shelter has placed over 45,000 animals in lifelong homes.has strives to educate the community in the proper and humane care of all animals in an effort to stop animal cruelty; and spay/neuter outreach to bring the awareness that spay/neuter procedures prevent animal over population and ultimately save animal lives.has microchips and vaccinates all animals before adoption, and spays/neuters all animals 6 months or older before adoption, and provides low-cost microchip clinics for the general public. In addition, as a community service, homeward (continued on schedule o) animal shelter provides a community pantry with dog/cat food to those who are unable to afford food for their animals. In 2025, homeward animal shelter rescued over 90% of all unclaimed animals from the fargo pound. With the ending of 2025, it has been 17 full years since the last time an adoptable dog was euthanized and 13 years since the last time an adoptable cat was euthanized, in any of the 3 local pounds.also in 2025, has partnered with the ndsu veterinary technology program. Dogs and cats from has receive veterinary care for a reduced cost through their role as animal educators. Students learn animal behavior, dog/cat breeds and colors, husbandry and feeding, basic grooming, and veterinary care. Dogs and cats, and students benefits from additional time together outside the classroom setting - truly a great partnership. Has is the only group in the fm community with a program designed to take in feral cats. They are vaccinated, spayed/neutered, then adopted out through the barn buddies program. Has is also the only group in the fm community to take in cats with feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus. Cats with these viruses are adoptable, and just need the right home to care for them.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.4%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 70.2%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.6%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.62; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.4% of revenue deployed · 70.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.