Homestead Sports Boosters Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391375521
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Thiensville, WI, USA
Phone
4143916860
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,321
Expenses
$36,610
Assets
$220,950

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mike Leaman (Vice-President)
  • Jack Blume (President)

People named in this filing

  • Julie Smallwood (Treasurer)
  • Deanna Burris (Secretary)
  • Mike Leaman (Vice-President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Homestead High school Booster Club exists to encourage, support, and advance Homestead athletic programs & activities. The Homestead High School Booster Club raises funds through a wide variety of activities including booster club membership, concessions, spirit wear sales and events. All money earned is used to directly support your student's sport. The Booster Club has donated over $1,500,000 in the last five years alone to support athletics at Homestead High School. The club consists of dedicated and energetic parents, teachers, coaches and alumni who collectively raise money for the club via their membership. Many of these individuals also help by coordinating concessions and spirit wear, managing scholarships, planning fun activities for members and more.

What it reported doing in 2024

Delivered scholarships to four athletic scholars

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Multi-channel. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 24% for direct work, 21% for grants, and 55% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.1%; rating input score 44
  • Program expense ratio: 51.9%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.1%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.04; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -34.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.1% of revenue deployed · 51.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.