Homeschool Etc Inc C/o Linda Kidder
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680626185
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Dacono, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3036187125
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,720
- Expenses
- $133,472
- Assets
- $61,002
- Liabilities
- $10,024
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIM TRAUM (PRESIDENT)
- HARRY TRAUM (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LINDA KIDDER (DIRECTOR)
- KIM TRAUM (PRESIDENT)
- HARRY TRAUM (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide christian-based encouragement, support and inspiration for homeschool families through many varied programs. Those working through the organization wish to minister the love of jesus christ through the use of their skills, expertise, eduation, background, experience and talents.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization's exempt purpose was accomplished as students of homeschool families participated in educational enrichment program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -45.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.