Homeland Security Mobile Trauma Unit Inc Co Maurizio Miglietta
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300501445
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Point Pleasant, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2019459906
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,396
- Expenses
- $27,168
- Assets
- $17,294
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- DR MAURIZIO MIGLIETTA (Director)
- DIANE BARTON (OFFICER)
- MICHAEL VAIANI (OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the mtu isto "heal those who protect us".the homeland security mobile trauma unit, inc. Is a not-for-profitorganization 501(c)(3) comprised of all volunteer medical personnel. Started in 2004, the mobile trauma unit, or mtu, has provided medical support to law enforcement entities including the united states secret service, department of state diplomatic security service, and others during national security events, high-level warrant executions and training exercises. The mtu has been activated for the united nations general assembly, presidential visits to New York city, the papal visit to New York city, the dalai lama, and other foreign dignitaries. There is currently no other organized medical team in the region with comparable on-scene immediate surgical capabilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
The mtu provides advanced surgical capabilities in the field for high-risk missions for federal agencies such as the us secret service, department of state - diplomatic security service, and the united nations - security service.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -35.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.