Homeaid Georgia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
580024106
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Alpharetta, GA, USA
Phone
6787751401
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Job Training

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,133,954
Expenses
$1,647,467
Assets
$2,062,519
Liabilities
$118,582

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JONATHAN WHITE (President)
  • CAROL MORGAN (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMANDA CRATER (Executive Dir.): $124,642 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

HomeAids mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

What it reported doing in 2025

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Organization operated the following programs: Housing: Since 2001, the Organization has completed over 180 housing, remodeling, and volunteer workday projects for local nonprofits working with people experiencing homelessness and provided nearly $5 million in savings to these organizations. Historically, the Organization provides 50% - 85% of the total cost of the construction project through in-kind donations of services and materials.Community Engagement & Education: The Organization reaches out to meet the immediate needs of Atlanta families and individuals experiencing homelessness and the organizations that assist these individuals.Every year, HomeAid Georgia, Inc. completes several HomeAid Care Days, HomeAid CareKits, and the Essentials Drive. Also, the Organization works to educate the public about the reality of the demographics and causes of homelessness and the need for affordable housing through events, social media and its website. Events include Homelessness Awareness Month in November each year and an annual Housing Affordability Forum. Additionally, the Organization partners with other organizations that provide awareness and advocacy around preventing and ending homelessness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $45.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.8%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.4% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 21 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 22 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.