Home Support Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352808027
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Knoxville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8653850759
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,690
- Expenses
- $81,779
- Assets
- $4,269
- Liabilities
- $151
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLOTTE BRABSON (President-FORME)
- AKIVIA WARE (President)
People named in this filing
- CHARLOTTE BRABSON (President-FORME)
- AKIVIA WARE (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Comprehensive in-home supportive care for adults and children
What it reported doing in 2025
Our services include: Personal Care Services, Attendant Care Services, In-Home Respite Care, Private Case Management, As part of these service we provide: Meal Preparatio; Laundry; Light Housekeeping; Companionship; Medication Reminders, Bathing, Dressing, and Grooming; Shopping, Errands and Accompany to appointments
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 61.6%; rating input score 62
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 158.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 61.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $50K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.