Home Place of Texas
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760652250
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Spring, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2812571004
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Camps
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $901,804
- Expenses
- $759,304
- Assets
- $944,851
- Liabilities
- $-2,049
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY DEGNAN (EXECUTIVE DI): $66,096 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Home place of Texas is a non-denominational christ-centered community for adults with disabilities. The organization provides residential services (program ended sept 2019), day habilitation services, bible study, improvement of life skills and job skills, and recreation. Our mission is to teach adults with disabilities that god loves them and has a plan for them - a plan for good. Our goal is that participants will come to understand that they are wonderfully made in the image of god. Our aim is for participants to become independent and mature adults and give back to the community where they live.
What it reported doing in 2024
The day program began in 2008. We expanded our space substantially in 2010 as the program doubled in size. The program continued to flourish and, with funds obtained from a grant, our facilities were expanded significantly in 2012. We serve over 200 adults with disabilities each week. The purpose of the day programs are to continue life-long learning, and to learn and practice work and social skills, learn to be a team member, take personal responsibility for actions, and gain work experience. Participants are provided numerous opportunities to volunteer in the community and develop work skills and appropriate workplace behavior under the supervision of a job coach. These activities teach the attributes necessary to successfully work in the community. We hired a job coach in 2012 and a second job coach in 2013 to expand our opportunities for volunteering in elderly care facilities, churches, and other nonprofit organizations. These activities allow our participants to gain much needed experience in the work place with supervision so that their work skills improve. They also learn appropriate workplace behavior. The residential service program was discontinued in september 2019.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $643K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $66K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.