Home Nursing Agency Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251467014
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Altoona, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8149465411
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,883,997
- Expenses
- $468,511
- Assets
- $5,646,544
- Liabilities
- $228,498
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT PACKER (CEO/PRESIDEN)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT PACKER (CEO/PRESIDEN): $566,245 total reported compensation
- GREGG LAVERICK (SVP/CFO): $385,347 total reported compensation
- NANCY FOGEL (SECRETARY): $3,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Home nursing agency foundation is referred to as the "foundation" or "hna foundation" within this form 990. Form 990, part i, line 1 and part iii, line 1 - organization's mission as provided in its articles, the corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for exempt purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (or the corresponding provision of any future united states internal revenue law)(the "code"), and, in furtherance thereof, operating exclusively for the benefit of and to support home nursing agency & visiting nurse association and home nursing agency community services, each a Pennsylvania nonprofit corporation, provided that each such corporation is an organization described in section 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) of the code, that ultimately results in a benefit to the individual, family and community.
What it reported doing in 2013
The response started below is completed in schedule o the 113,900 total above represents grants and gifts from the home nursing agency foundation to the home nursing agency community services in the year ended june 30, 2014. See schedule o the foundation grants and contributions to home nursing agency community services provided funding for client services and much needed program supplies for various behavioral health and day support programs including: AIDS intervention projects - funds used for personal care/hygiene items, cleaning supplies, vitamins and dietary supplements, and assist homeless individuals and families dealing with HIV/AIDS. Nurse family partnership - funding to provide support to this evidence-based community health program that transforms the lives of first-time mothers living in poverty by improving pre-natal care and parenting skills resulting in child's healthy growth and development and to improve self-sufficiency. Nurse family partnership serves seven counties, providing care to 300 - 600 families each year. Acel - adult center for exceptional learning - dollars to support the continuation of the southern alleghenies museum of art (sama) artists-in-residence program that provides acel individuals who have cognitive and physical disabilities the opportunity to experience art, painting, dancing, and storytelling, which can improve thier quality of life. Acel - adult center for exceptional learning - funds for individuals who attend the day program but who go over his/her funding allocation cap as well as help those who have no funding available and cannot self-pay for services. Adult day services - to provide additional days of support to help families successfully manage the caring of a loved one who is living at home and is unable to independently perform self-care activities or function alone safely. Adult day services can prevent or delay institutionalization through medical monitoring, social and recreational activites and personal care. Adult day services - to support the southern alleghenies musuem of art (sama) artists-in-residence program that provides adult day services individuals with art experiences, i.e. Painting, dancing, and storytelling to improve thier quality of life. Blended case management/resource coordination - for clients of the behavioral health program who have unexpected emergencies or when an individual has minimal income and needs beyond normal circumstances. Also helps fund household and personal hygiene products, clothes for employment/school and bus passes for those starting employment. Blended case management/children and adolescents - to be used for children and adolescents who are enrolled in the children's behavioral health program who are in need of personal/hygiene products, cleaning products, food, seasonal clothing items and other daily living needs. Also to be used for start up costs for community and school based activities, such as intramural sports, boy scouts, girl scouts, and used in situations to assist children and families with no or limited income. This program currently serves more than 400 children, adolescents and families. Adult group blair (art therapy) / adult partial hospitalization (art therapy is used in treating post-traumatic stress disorders, anxiety disorders, and depression and self-esteem symptoms. The partial hospital program - offers intense therapy to individuals who are severally depressed, anxious, or experiencing psychosis.) - dollars to support adult behavioral health program clients utilizing the art therapy as part of their treatment plan. Funding to support art supplies used in weekly art therapy sessions and an end of year art show recognizing their art. Center for counseling: funds to assist in providing treatment to more than 300 children and 1,000 individuals who are experiencing behavioral health issues and who otherwise would not receive services due to having no insurance, high co-pays/deductibles or private insurances wou
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.6%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 31.7%; rating input score 32
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 75.1%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.05; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 57.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 32% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.6% of revenue deployed · 31.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $148K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $566K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 65 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.