Home Health Foundation of Dallas In

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 752045196
IRS 990 coverage: 2009–2013
Forms available: Form 990 2013
Location: Carrollton, TX, USA
Rating: 75
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Home Health Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue: $80,718
Expenses: $306,270
Assets: $143,313
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

MICHAEL KURILECZ JR (PRESIDENT/TR)
PATRICIA DRISCOLL (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

PATRICIA DRISCOLL (CEO): $153,817 total reported compensation
JANET BUTTERFIELD (VP FINANCE): $77,076 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to support home health services of dallas, inc., home health services of houston, inc., and home health services of Texas, inc., who promote quality health care and related services to individuals as a commitment to meeting community health care needs.

What it reported doing in 2013

Home health foundation of dallas, inc. (hhfd) is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes for the benefit of and to support home health services of dallas, inc. (hhsd), home health services of houston, inc. (hhsh), and home health services of Texas, inc. (hhst). All 501(c) (3) organizations, providing skilled nursing services, other therapeutic care, and related management services primarily to homebound patients in their homes. Hhfd shall support and benefit hhsd, hhsh, and hhst by, among other things, holding, investing and managing assets, properties and funds for the benefit of hhsd and hhsh, who have performed approximately 30,000 home health visits, which included 300 charity care visits and over 6,000 reduced rate visits and for the benefit of hhst performing related management services for hhsd.

Operating model

Revenue model: Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model: Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 89
Transparency & Controls: 68
Accountability: 91
Sustainability: 17
Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

Operating margin: -279.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -26.8% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -54.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $306K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $154K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.