Home for Aged Women-minquadale Home Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510075766
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Wilmington, DE, USA
Phone
3026544486
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,948,175
Expenses
$13,884,697
Assets
$17,705,235
Liabilities
$929,028

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT REESE (PRESIDENT)
  • TERRENCE MCBRIDE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PAUL GUGGENBERGER (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • PAUL SMILEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAUL SMILEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $246,355 total reported compensation
  • JESSICA BANNAN (ADMINISTRATOR): $163,563 total reported compensation
  • AGNES NJOROGE (ADMINISTRATOR): $162,507 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life of elderly residents and day-program participants by providing a secure and caring environment, in a family setting, within the context of the larger community.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization provides (1) assisted care for residents requiring minimal assistance. Services include personal care, medication administration, nutritional care, socialization, 24-hour on call nursing care, housekeeping and laundry services; (2) intermediate and skilled nursing care. Services include 24-hour nursing care, medical supervision, assistance with activities of daily living, nutritional care, socialization, housekeeping and laundry services, physical/occupational/speech therapy, housekeeping and laundry services; and (3) adult day program for members of the community requiring a secure and caring environment in a medical model setting.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $246K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.