Home Based Health Charity Inc Nfp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452861868
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Flossmoor, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7087980800
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,876
- Expenses
- $3,155
- Assets
- $1,954
- Liabilities
- $2,137
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROMY MACASAET (President)
People named in this filing
- ROMY MACASAET (President)
- JULIETA MITRA (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized exclusively for a charitable purpose pursuant to the regulations of the internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) including delivering food to poor persons as defined by the Illinois department of health and human services, the Illinois department of rehabilitative services, and the Illinois department of aging, at no cost to the recipients.
What it reported doing in 2016
Delivery of food to the poor
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.5%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 29.6%; rating input score 30
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.09; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -194% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -181.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 181.3% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.5% of revenue deployed · 29.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $935 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.