Holzer Hospital Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 314379491
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Gallipolis, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7404465060
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $239,612,155
- Expenses
- $210,671,742
- Assets
- $121,679,679
- Liabilities
- $55,791,271
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADAM RITCHIE MD (TRUSTEE - MEDICAL STAFF PRESIDENT)
- RODNEY STOUT (CEO - HHS)
Highest reported compensation
- RODNEY STOUT (CEO - HHS): $648,360 total reported compensation
- ADAM RITCHIE MD (TRUSTEE - MEDICAL STAFF PRESIDENT): $541,712 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL HAYNES (CFO - HHS): $407,496 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Friendly visits, excellent care; every patient, every time.
What it reported doing in 2024
The hospital accepts all patients regardless of their ability to pay. A patient is classified as a charity patient by reference to certain established policies of the hospital. In assessing a patient's inability to pay, the hospital compares incurred charges with generally recognized poverty income levels and the patient's financial resources. Because the hospital does not expect to receive payment for amounts determined to qualify as charity care, these amounts are not reported as net patient service revenues. Consistent with its mission, the hospital provides community services intended to benefit the underserved and enhance the health status of the community. The hospital operates a 24 hour per day, 7 day per week emergency room providing care to all patients. The hospital operates holzer hospice.continuing education, certification programs, and informational seminars are conducted for both hospital and medical staff. Health fairs are conducted at no charge. Additionally, the hospital's mobile unit is taken to community events to perform free screenings, and dispense educational materials. Hospital staff also responds to requests from employers and community groups, along with senior citizen centers, for screenings and informational programs. Educational support groups, such as diabetes and cancer, and an educational group meeting for strokes, are sponsored by the hospital. The hospital's meeting rooms are made available to organizations at no charge for health-related programming and meetings. Additionally, civic and professional organizations are invited to the hospital regularly for programs that are educational and informational on health care services as developed.speakers from the hospital staff are available and respond to speaking invitations for groups and organizations in the hospital's service area. The hospital offers many services to the community at nominal or no charge, including blood pressure and blood sugar screenings, cholesterol checks, hemoglobin, pulse oximetry, prostate checks, bone density, and tumor registry. The pediatric unit works in conjunction with the gallia county health department in promoting free immunizations. Assistance is also provided to senior citizens and other patients and their families with the submissions of forms for insurance, financial counseling, and application to the medicare and medicaid programs for health service coverage. Costs associated with these programs are included in the hospital's expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 40
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 12.5%; rating input score 12; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.1%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.6% of revenue deployed · 93.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $196.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $648K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.1M reported
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 12/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.