Holyoke Young Men's Christian Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042192693
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Holyoke, MA, USA
- Phone
- 4135345631
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,878,208
- Expenses
- $3,659,542
- Assets
- $7,723,754
- Liabilities
- $164,672
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAREN BETOURNAY (PRESIDENT)
- KATE SULLIVAN-CRAVEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JASON FERREIRA (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- CONOR BEVAN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CONOR BEVAN (CEO): $161,307 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Helping all in the greater holyoke community achieve their fullest potential in spirit, mind and body.
What it reported doing in 2025
Healthy living - we believe they should feel like a second home and therefore provide a welcoming place for all to achieve their fullest potential. The ymca isa leading voice in the health and well being of the communities we serve. We encourage good health and foster personal connections through programs that promote fitness, personal well being, nutrition, aquatics and sports. Through our y, people in the community are receiving the guidance and support necessary to improve their overall health. The y offers programs that promote good health, safety and security around water, sportsmanship and teamwork and inclusion of all. This is particularly important as people struggle with a variety of health issues such as hypertension, obesity, asthma, diabetes and other chronic diseases that are reaching crisis levels. The y is perfectly positioned to step in and help change these trends. We insure our programs are accessible to all through our financial assistance program. No one is turned away for an inability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.2%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.2% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $161K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.