Holyoke Revolver Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
711023439
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Holyoke, MA, USA
Phone
4135399345
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fishing, Hunting

Reported finances

Revenue
$106,026
Expenses
$105,439
Assets
$334,019
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID CHAPDELAINE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID CHAPDELAINE (PRESIDENT)
  • JEREMY P CARRIERE (VICE PREDSIDENT)
  • ALAN FORCIER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide an environment where individuals of all ages and families can enjoy shooting sports. The organization also provides firearm safety training courses.

What it reported doing in 2021

Activity - HRC sponsorship of Nationally Sanctioned Junior Shooting ProgramObjective - Create a learning and recognition path for junior shooters within an organized, nationalprogram. HRC provides an annual stipend of approximately $2,500 and further matches any funds raisedby the juniors up to an additional $2,500 for additional program expenses related to tournamentenrollment and other expense.Accomplishments - HRC's Junior Team has competed in regional and national events (and engages inthe necessary intramural practice needed to build proficiency) with great success. The secondary valuewith this participation and recognition is that organized events allow opportunity for college recruitment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 15
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 15.2%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 15.8%; rating input score 16

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.17; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 15.2% of revenue deployed · 15.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.