Holy Family Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742282624
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Weslaco, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9569692538
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,760,826
- Expenses
- $1,291,822
- Assets
- $726,181
- Liabilities
- $300,931
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SANDRA DE LA CRUZ-YARRISON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MARY DE HOYOS (President)
- FRANK DE HOYOS (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- SANDRA DE LA CRUZ-YARRISON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $84,098 total reported compensation
- AMY BECKMAN (CLINICAL DIRECTOR): $18,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Holy family services provides ante-partum, intra-partum, post-partum, well woman health care, and well child health care services and education to the women and families of the rio grande valley. Holy family services provides material, clothing and food assistance.
What it reported doing in 2024
Holy family services is a non-profit corporation providing ante-partum, intra-partum, post-partum, womens health services and newborn care services. The clinic and birth center services include, but is not limited to, the following: physical exams, lab tests, natural/water birth options, routine newborn screenings , breastfeeding assistance, annual health exams, pap smears, breast exams, preventative screenings, std testing and treatment, pregnancy tests and education on various prenatal and womens health topics. Furthermore, holy family services is a food bank location assisting families in need of food, clothing and other child care items. During the fiscal year which ended in june 30, 2025, the following services were rendered: approximately 3,075 clinic visits, 1,454 pregnant women received prenatal care, 209 well-women services, 91 gynecology visits, 91 deliveries were attended, 218 class attendees, 159 orientations, 307 post partum visits, and 118 women received free pregnancy testing and counseling.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.6%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $168.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.6%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.6% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.