Sinai Chicago
Legal name: Holy Cross Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362170133
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 773-542-2000
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $137,327,552
- Expenses
- $151,453,941
- Assets
- $95,066,906
- Liabilities
- $85,285,023
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
39 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NGOZI EZIKE MD (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- JEEN-SOO CHANG (SITE PRESIDENT)
- KIMBERLY PERDEW (ASSISTANT CNO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- NGOZI EZIKE MD (PRESIDENT & CEO): $863,356 total reported compensation
- RUSSELL FIORELLA (SYSTEM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $683,246 total reported compensation
- ILIANA ANDREA MORA (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $599,594 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The hospital is a catholic health care organization sponsored by the sisters of st. Casimir. By our commitment to witness to the healing mission of jesus, we contribute to healthy communities and promote quality health care to all with compassion.
What it reported doing in 2024
The hospital is a not-for-profit catholic hospital that serves a large area of chicago's southwest side. Located in marquette park, the hospital provides emergency, medical/surgical, specialty, diagnostics, behavioral health and primary care services to communities that are home to mostly racially diverse and low-income families. The emergency department sees approximately 37,350 patients per year and 13,145 ambulance visits. The hospital is a disproportionate share hospital and is a vital safety net hospital.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.8%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 94.8% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $130.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $863K · 39 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.9M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.