Hollywood Senior Center Dba Community for Positive Aging

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237291187
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032888303
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,059,894
Expenses
$2,308,628
Assets
$3,073,577
Liabilities
$307,520

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDA ANDERSON (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMBER KERN-JOHNSON (Executive Dir.): $142,758 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The center focuses on offering a diverse range of services with the singular focus of empowering older adults to live their lives with independence, and a sense of fulfillment. The center is committed to providing services, information, education and recreation for seniors, families and caregivers in multnomah county.the center evolves in response to a growing senior population with expanding and changing needs. We envision a caring and healthy community which encourages intergenerational relationships, recognizes the wisdom and experience of its elders and demonstrates awareness and respect for the aging process. The center is committed to addressing the social, cultural, environmental and economic needs that create barriers that impact the wellness of older adults.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community health navigation, vaccination efforts, and emergency preparednesscfpas community health team works to reduce health disparities faced by low-income and bipoc older adults through multilingual education, outreach, and personalized health navigation. Over the past year, our team connected with more than 3,500 community members, coordinated 105 vaccinations, distributed 265 emergency preparedness kits and participated in 27 health and wellness events reaching 1,680 attendees. These efforts included educational presentations designed to empower older adults with the knowledge and confidence to manage their health and access care.cfpa also prioritizes emergency preparedness, ensuring that vulnerable older adults have the resources, information, and support needed to respond effectively to health crises and natural disasters. Following the conclusion of cares act funding for covid-19 response, cfpa has pursued new partnerships, contracts, and grants to sustain and expand these essential programs. Our staff and board of directors remain committed to fiscal stewardship, adaptability, and continuous improvement to ensure that our programs evolve alongside community needs.looking ahead, the community for positive aging will continue building a more connected and resilient community where older adults are valued, supported, and empowered to thrive. Guided by our mission and strengthened by the dedication of our staff, volunteers, and partners, we remain committed to advancing health, belonging, and accessibility for portlands aging population.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.