Kehillas Hollywood Hills
Legal name: Hollywood Hills Congregation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 884228835
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Hollywood, FL, United States
- Phone
- +1 754-300-6659
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,068
- Expenses
- $109,883
- Assets
- $55,185
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Guy Benhanan (President)
- Yehuda Goldfarb (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Guy Benhanan (President)
- Yehuda Goldfarb (Vice President)
- Raphael Rosin (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A Torah-centered, community-based shul committed to the spiritual growth of its members and guests, offering Shabbos and Yom Tov services (with childcare) and engaging programs throughout the year. Led by Rav Eliezer Goldschmiedt, KHH provides opportunities for learning and inspiration at every level. Our aim is to nurture and enrich the spiritual journey of every family and individual who walks through our doors. teaches Chassanim, serving as their Rav and Poseik after marriage. As Rav of Kehillas Hollywood Hills, he strives to build the community at both the individual and communal level. Semicha from Bais Medrash Govoah. Additionally, he received training in different areas of marital life under Rav Eliezer Gewirtzman and Rav Mayer Gruenebaum. He started and lead a Chabura learning Sugyos in Halacha, encouraging the Bnei HaChaburah to be tested on the material they learn. Lastly, he.
What it reported doing in 2023
Consistent weekly prayer services that have evolved into daily prayer services. Additionally, there is a kids group every Saturday for girls and boys ages 4-6 years old where they can play and learn in? the? side? room.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.