Holly Hall Endowment Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462695510
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
7137999031
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,610
Assets
$19,087
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • TOM A MENGES (DIRECTOR)
  • JERRY MCNEILL (DIRECTOR)
  • JAMES P HOUSTOUN III (CHAIRMAN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the holly hall endowment foundation is to create and manage an endowment for the exclusive benefit and support of holly hall. Holly hall is a christian retirement community, offering care for independent, assisted and healthcare living for residents, both men and women, of varying needs in a loving, home-like facility.

What it reported doing in 2024

The holly hall endowment foundation continued to be in an organizational stage. Once it is fully operational, it will support and benefit holly hall by (a) soliciting, receiving, holding, investing and managing gifts, grants, contributions and bequests through an endowment fund in order to support the long-term mission, goals, purposes and ministries of holly hall, (b) making periodic distributions to holly hall and/or engaging in activities that support and benefit the mission of holly hall.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.86; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.