Holliday Volunteer Fire and Rescue Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208142607
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Holliday, TX, USA
Phone
9405860057
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fire Prevention

Reported finances

Revenue
$109,402
Expenses
$83,215
Assets
$305,036
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lyle Riley (President)
  • Travis Goodman (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Lyle Riley (President)
  • Travis Goodman (Vice President)
  • Ryan Matthews (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Holliday Volunteer Fire and Rescue, Inc. seeks to improve the lives of those around us by preparing for and responding to fires, medical emergencies, and other calamities within our community, utilizing dedicated, trained volunteers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Firefighting and Emergency Response Services: Our department provided 24/7 firefighting and emergency response services to a rural area covering approximately 135 square miles, serving a population of approximately 3,500 residents. Over the past year, our volunteer team responded to 211 emergency calls, including 60 fires, 20 vehicle accidents, and 131 medical emergencies. Our quick response provided critical assistance in remote areas where immediate emergency services are limited.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.5%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.9%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.67; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 77.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 57.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.5% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $82K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.