Holistic Haitian Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264545377
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2021
- Location
- Haymarket, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7032983183
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,833,437
- Expenses
- $2,039,369
- Assets
- $3,342,575
- Liabilities
- $27,153
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Debbie Harvey (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Debbie Harvey (President): $126,000 total reported compensation
- Mike Hoover (Goverance): $75,060 total reported compensation
- William Harvey (Fundraising): $38,767 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Kay Anj Village (KAV) is located on 40 acres in Northern Haiti. HHA provides primary secondary and vocational school education, trauma care, dental clinic, agriculture, transitional and independent care for orphaned and abandoned children, young adults, community developement and is home to Hope Church
What it reported doing in 2025
Our mission is to Glorify God, equip leaders and transform lives. Kay Anj Village (KAV) is located on 40 acres in Northern Haiti. HHA provides primary, secondary and vocational school education, trauma care, dental clinic, agriculture, transitional and independent care for orphaned and abandoned children, young adults and community development. It is home to Hope Church.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 49
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 81.2%; rating input score 81; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.2%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 34 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.