Holiday Pool Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475387192
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Keizer, OR, USA
Phone
5039995205
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$74,520
Expenses
$68,251
Assets
$81,015

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LEYLA FOLSOM (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LEYLA FOLSOM (PRESIDENT)
  • NICOLE MANLEY (TREASURER)
  • EDITH HICKS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To bring community members together by providing a safe and inviting atmosphere where kids and adults alike can learn to swim and enjoy the benefits of a pool facility.

What it reported doing in 2024

Holiday swim club is a mutual benefit non-profit that exists for the purpose of bringing community members together. The pool has been maintained by neighboring members of the keizer community since 1964. We strive to provide a safe and inviting atmosphere where kids and adults alike can learn to swim and enjoy the benefits of a pool facility. While we are a private club, we welcome all those who want to become a member of holiday swim club. Our swim lessons extend to the general public in the attempt to teach each child water safety and basic swimming skills. It is our belief that by engagng and investing in those people and facilities around us we build an atmosphere where community can take root. Holiday swim club invites you to join in our efforts to continue the tradition of building an atmosphere where we can all thrive by exploring our website or scheduling a visit.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.