Holding on to Hope Monterey County Family Justice Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934861096
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Salinas, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8317555255
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Victims' Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,312
- Expenses
- $7,974
- Assets
- $51,338
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEANNINE PACIONI (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEANNINE PACIONI (PRESIDENT)
- LANA NASSOURA (SECRETARY)
- LAURA ZEHM (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The exempt purpose of the organization is to fundraise for all holding on to hope monterey county family justice center locations, and to operate the salinas, California location. The mission of holding on to hope, county of monterey family justice center is to provide one place for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, elder abuse, and human trafficking to receive services from governmental agencies and community-based organizations in order to aid in the breaking of generational violence. Family justice centers co-locate, coordinate, and integrate services where victims and their children travel to fewer places and reduce the number of times they tell their story. With a commitment towards healing, community, and safety, family justice centers strive to integrate partners to create a comprehensive service network to alleviate or prevent future crimes of violence.
What it reported doing in 2024
The vision of the holding on to hope, county of monterey family justice center is to create a future where our community has ended the cycle of violence, and to create a community that works together to ensure survivors of domestic violence, child abuse, sexual abuse, elder abuse and human trafficking have access to all the resources they need to heal, thrive, and feel empowered.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.4%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 47.8%; rating input score 48
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.44; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.4% of revenue deployed · 47.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.