Hoke County Partnership for Children and Families
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561898931
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Raeford, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9109045452
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $914,288
- Expenses
- $900,683
- Assets
- $132,163
- Liabilities
- $73,787
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEAN SQUIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JEAN SQUIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $68,866 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The partnership believes in helping children and families by providing a foundation to develop self-assurance for life through education and resources.
What it reported doing in 2024
Health & safety - 100% of children seen for speech-language delays for at least 90 days made progress in their development. 100% of parents of the children who received services reported that they have used learned speech therapy procedures with their children. 100% of child care providers receiving consultations regarding children with special needs reported using the learned therapy procedures with the children in their classrooms. 80% of children seen for applied behavior analysis for at least 180 days made progress towards their development, as evidenced by their treatment plans. The safe sleep cribettes program is a comprehensive initiative to promote safe sleep practices and reduce sleep-related infant deaths. 100% of all families who received cribettes demonstrated proper set up and reported using the information learned in the safe sleep class to practice safe sleep for their infants.program support - program management activities included conducting on-site fiscal and programmatic monitoring of all funded projects, as well as the ongoing coordination of projects and activiities, to determine if short-term and long-term goals are being achieved.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.7%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 69.2%; rating input score 69; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.7% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $765K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 14 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $420K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.