Hoag Charity Sports
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452982422
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Irvine, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9496601001
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,817,250
- Expenses
- $4,674,791
- Assets
- $6,216,676
- Liabilities
- $7,055,215
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FLYNN ANDRIZZI (FORMER FOUNDATION PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT BRAITHWAITE (CHAIR): $3,921,506 total reported compensation
- ANDREW GUARNI (TREASURER): $1,561,752 total reported compensation
- FLYNN ANDRIZZI (FORMER FOUNDATION PRESIDENT): $1,070,756 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hoag charity sports is a non-profit benefit corporation whose purpose is to engage in charitable activities. Hoag charity sports operates for the benefits of hoag memorial hospital presbyterian, but also supports other charitable causes as deemed fit by the organization.
What it reported doing in 2024
The specific purpose of hoag charity sports is to engage in charitable activities for the benefit of hoag memorial hospital presbyterian by holding a pga golf tournament with proceeds to support hoag hospital programs and charitable causes deemed fit by the organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.2%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 4%; rating input score 4
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 99; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.13; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.2% of revenue deployed · 4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $185K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.9M · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $3.8M reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.