Hmong American Partnership Fox Valley
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391378632
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Appleton, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9205159324
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,465
- Expenses
- $42,140
- Assets
- $208,373
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JONATHAN MOUA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JONATHAN MOUA (PRESIDENT)
- KA YING THAO (VICE PRESIDE)
- ZONG YANG (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To strengthen and empower our community through collaboration, resources, and promoting a healthy cultural identity.
What it reported doing in 2024
1. Community service: hap is proud to serve as an active member of the tri-county community health improvement coalition and the city of appleton comprehensive plan committee, driving key initiatives for our communitys future. Hap assisted in data collection with the hmong community. Hap assisted community members to take surveys from the coalitions, hosted listening sessions, and volunteered at community engagement events to help the hmong community better understand efforts. 2. Community economic impact: it is estimated that the 2024 fox cities hmong new year celebration had an attendance of over 4,000 people and generated a total economic impact of over 1 million dollars that included 974,000 of lodging, food and beverage spending, parking fees, and other purchases. This event also contributed an estimated 47,500 in local sales tax revenue. 3. Volunteer impact: hap had over 160 volunteers in 2024. Being able to provide community members, youth, and young people the opportunity to volunteer and take on leadership roles in our community programs and events has remained a goal of ours to build capacity, leadership skills, and future community leaders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.4%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.94; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.