HIV-assist Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844046667
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Elkridge, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4103509513
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,823
- Expenses
- $193,380
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Maunank Shah (President)
People named in this filing
- Maunank Shah (President)
- Manoj Maddali (Secretary)
- Jonathan Li (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
HIV-ASSIST is a free, interactive, educational tool created by expert clinicians to inform clinical decision-making for antiretroviral therapy selection for persons living with HIV. HIV-ASSIST utilizes a multiple-criteria decision-analysis framework to integrate clinical factors eg, HIV-1 RNA level, mutation analysis, comorbidities, etc. and generates a ranked list of recommended ARV regimens individualized for each patient. Recommendations provided by the tool are delivered based on an algorithm that weighs both current management guidelines and clinical evidence against individual patient factors. In addition to providing recommendations on ARVRT selection, HIV-ASSIST includes resources on individual antiretrovirals such as supporting clinical trial evidence, potential ARV combinations, and considerations for comorbidities and comedications. All algorithms are created with input of the volunteer Scientific Advisory Committee, which makes decisions independent of any external agencies
What it reported doing in 2025
Our free interactive educational tool had 6500 usages, totaling over 34,000 since inception. Number of registered users increased to over 1100. See Schedule O for more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -198.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $187K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.