Open Health Care Clinic
Legal name: HIV-AIDS Alliance for Region Two Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721283359
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Baton Rouge, LA, US
- Phone
- (225) 655-6422
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $73,988,017
- Expenses
- $68,057,322
- Assets
- $30,237,320
- Liabilities
- $10,189,032
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tim Young (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Joseph Freeman MD (Physician): $331,554 total reported compensation
- Tim Young (CEO): $319,944 total reported compensation
- Michael Hymbaugh MD (Physician): $304,143 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide comprehensive primary care, behavioral healthcare, and support services to everyone in Baton Rouge, Denham Springs, and surrounding areas, regardless of insurance or income status.
What it reported doing in 2024
Housing and Supportive Services - HAART receives two types of grant funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). They are 1) Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA), funded through the CityParish of East Baton Rouge, and 2) Supportive Housing Program (SHP), funded directly by HUD and coordinated through the Louisiana Housing Corporation. The HOPWA grant funds are used to prevent homelessness among persons with AIDS and are used for Project-based and Tenant-based housing assistance, Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Supportive Services. SHP funds are used to assist homeless persons including special populations and the chronically homeless. HAART has two SHP grants which are used for permanent housing assistance and supportive services to help ensure clients remain housed in order to thrive.HAART has used HOPWA and Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) funds for the acquisition of land and buildings, reflected on the balance sheet net of depreciation, consisting of eight single family homes and a ten-unit apartment complex.HAART also receives Ryan White Part A funding which is used to provide non-medical case management, pharmaceutical assistance, medical transportation, and other services. This program is administered in the nine-parish Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) by the City-Parish of East Baton Rouges Department of Human and Developmental Services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $61.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $332K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $22.6M reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.