Hitchcock Isd Education Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371758795
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Hitchcock, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4093166546
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $38,015
- Expenses
- $62,582
- Assets
- $66,362
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Monica Cantrell (Executive Director)
- Kathy Cruse Marullo (President)
- Jimmy Fullen (Vice-President of Financial Affairs)
People named in this filing
- Monica Cantrell (Executive Director)
- Kathy Cruse Marullo (President)
- Jimmy Fullen (Vice-President of Financial Affairs)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support educational programs for the students and teachers of the Hitchcock Independent School District.
What it reported doing in 2025
Classroom grants for students and teachers to provide support for educational programs. To facilitate student achievement and skills development, to recognize and encourage staff excellence in grades Pre-K through 12th grade high school graduation, including programs and incentives for Head Start, special education and autistic students. A total of 1993 students and 349 faculty and staff members benefit from services provided by the Hitchcock ISD Education Foundation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.1%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 58.4%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -64.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 52.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.1% of revenue deployed · 58.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.