Hit It Farr For Kirby

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 262222380
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2010–2013
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2013
Location: Clayton, NC, USA
Rating: 68
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue: $32,338
Expenses: $32,544
Assets: $1,101
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

Blake Roberson (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide resources for Autism Research

What it reported doing in 2013

This organization held a fundraising golf tournament Over 16000 was contributed to Autism research

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 51
Transparency & Controls: 100
Sustainability: 38
Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
Program expense ratio: 50.8%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -27.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 50.8% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.