Historical Society of the United States District Court for the District of Md

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061817896
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4109491149
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,518
Expenses
$124,936
Assets
$100,106
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • GREGORY K WELLS ESQ (TRUSTEE)
  • HERBERT BETTER ESQ (TRUSTEE)
  • HONORABLE ALEXANDER WILLIAMS JR (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The historical society was founded in 2007 to heighten the public's awareness of the rich history of the united states district court for the district of Maryland since its inception in 1789. To enhance the administration of justice in the court and to educate those who frequent the courthouses in baltimore and greenbelt about the court's role in society and its impact on history, the historical society, governed by a board of trustees, will undertake a variety of projects such as the creation of exhibits in the courthouses, the preservation and restoration of court documents and artifacts, the recording of oral histories of senior judges and others, and the commissioning of portraits and photographs of judges and lawyers who have served the court.

What it reported doing in 2024

The historical society's projects include the creation of exhibits located in the corridors and other public areas in the courthouses with themes relevant to the history of the court, oral histories, portraits, and photographs of judges and members of the bar, preservation of historical documents and artifacts, and educational programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -55.2%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.