Hispanic Urban Minority Alcholism and Drug Abuse Outreach Program Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341622274
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2164591222
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,188,437
- Expenses
- $923,146
- Assets
- $261,717
- Liabilities
- $321,516
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IVETTE NORIEGA PHD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- RAFIE STURGIS (EXECUTIVE DI): $94,075 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To empower the hispanic/latinx and larger community to reduce the negative impact of HIV/AIDS, violence, abuse of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs through culturally sensitive holistic prevention education, harm reduction, peer-support services, client-centered treatment, and re-entry programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Prevention services youth in action a year-long bilingual and culturally competent in-school youth development and substance prevention education geared towards middle and high school students. This education curriculum teaches social and emotional learning techniques, knowledge and attitudes for setting goals, how to maintain positive relationships, and responsible decision making. Family connections substance use and violence prevention curriculum, to increase parental skills, positive family engagement, family bonding, access to community resources, and setting effective substance use rules for incarcerated women in the northeast reintegration center. La mariposa (the butterfly) a bilingual and culturally competent group practice to counter harmful female stereotypes, encourage genuine self-expression, and generate personal accountability by building healthy relational and cultural connections, navigating personal challenges, increasing self- empowerment, and enhancing social-emotional skills in adolescent girls, ages 9-18 years. Project nios a year-long bilingual and culturally competent in-school youth development and substance prevention education geared towards pre-k and elementary school aged children. This education curriculum teaches social and emotional learning techniques, knowledge and attitudes for setting goals, how to maintain positive relationships, and responsible decision making.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 64% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.6%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 67.7%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.23; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.6% of revenue deployed · 67.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $625K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.