Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Hawaii
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843171650
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Mililani, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8086838244
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,610
- Expenses
- $23,933
- Assets
- $13,606
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Barbara de Lucca (President)
- Marysol Ruiz (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Barbara de Lucca (President)
- Marysol Ruiz (Vice-President)
- Ruben Juarez (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote economic empowerment, cultural representation, and community development for the Hispanic and broader underserved communities in Hawai'i through education, networking, and public events.
What it reported doing in 2024
To promote cultural understanding, community engagement, and economic opportunity for Hawaii's Hispanic population through public events, education, and wellness initiatives. In 2024, the organization hosted the Cuauhtémoc Ship and welcomed over 10,000 participants to associated cultural activities; organized the annual Cinco de Mayo Celebration with over 2,000 attendees to support local Hispanic businesses; held a Día de los Muertos Gala with over 200 participants; collaborated on health and wellness efforts; and led over half a dozen additional cultural and educational events for the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 61.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 60.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 54.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.