His Kingdom Aviation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
394411057
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Nevada, TX, USA
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,775
Expenses
$79
Assets
$40,696

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Benjamin Kyle Thompson III (President)
  • Benjamin Thompson Jr (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Benjamin Kyle Thompson III (President)
  • Benjamin Thompson Jr (Vice President)
  • Kerry Shepherd (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of His Kingdom Aviation is to provide educational opportunities for underprivileged youth to pursue careers in aviation, including pilot training through commercial licensure and certification as Airframe and Powerplant mechanics. In addition, the organization seeks to use general aviation to serve communities in need, promoting both professional development and humanitarian outreach. His Kingdom Aviation operates exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

What it reported doing in 2025

His Kingdom Aviation was organized late in 2025 and has been successful in beginning to raise funds to fulfil its Mission. As of the end of 2025 HKA was still in launch mode to spread the message of its organization as well as trying find and purchase assets for its main purpose, Aviation Education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.2%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 515.14; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $79 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.