His Hands Disaster Response Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455117181
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Cataula, GA, USA
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,828
Expenses
$6,822
Assets
$4,006

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was formed to organize volunters in harris county, ga to be able to assist those in need in case of a disaster. Devastation and destruction by weather happens every year in our country. Other areas of need caused by fire and other forms of destruction also happen daily in our country. We need to partner with organizations allready in place to be first responders to disasters. We want to be able to help the victims of these disasters and provide needed supplies and help. We need to acquire equipment and have it in place when a disaster happens in our county or other nearby areas. We need to have funds to pay for transporting supplies and other needs to the people in need from disasters. We need to organize ahead of time, other organizations that can assist in recovery from a disaster. We need to be able to provided for all needs and to fill the void where there are not being covered now.

What it reported doing in 2012

In this our first year of existance we raised money to be approved as a 501c3 organization. We are trying to make our presence known and to enlist volunteers to help us in achieving our mission. We purchased supplies to let the populace know we exist. We partnered with the local middle school to raise funds for our mission. We look forward to forming relataions with other existing organizations that will partner with us in case of a local disaster.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.